Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms

Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms

Source :

• Journal of Public Economics [ 0047-2727 ] ; 1998.

English descriptors

• Teeft :
  • 2sls, Additional dollar, Adequate housing, Altruistic behavior, Capita income, Capita income3type, Capita unemployment, Caput, Charitable, Charitable activity, Charitable contributions, Charitable donations, Charitable goods, Charitable organizations, Charity donations, Constant dollars, Constant elasticity, Cooperative economics, Democratic governor3type, Democratic party, Democratic senators, Democratic senators ratio, Dollar increase, Domestic violence, Donation, Donor, Economic conditions, Economic journal, Economic measures, Economic variables, Effects effects, Empirical model, Endogeneity, Exogenous, Exogenous measures, Federal education, Food stamps, Funding, Good change, Government contract, Government contributions, Government expenditures, Government funding, Government grant, Government grants, Government grants term, Government policy, Government spending, Government transfer payments, Government transfers, Governmental transfers, Hausman tests, Heterogeneity, Human services, Human services organizations, Impure altruism, Individual transfers, Instruments firm, Legislators ratio, Local level, Organizations crime, Other individuals, Other measures, Other organizations, Other types, Panel data, Passive players, Payne journal, Political economy, Political measures, Political variables, Positive government grants, Possible endogeneity, Potential endogeneity, Poverty rate, Private donations, Private donors, Private goods, Private provision, Private spending, Program service revenue, Public contributions, Public donations, Public economics, Public goods, Public radio stations, Public safety, Representatives ratio, Same state, Second stage regression, Shelter category, Shelter organizations, Social services, Stage process, Stage regression, Standard error, Standard errors, State level, State population, State population3type, Such things, Total house, Total state, Transfer payments, Unemployment rate, Unemployment rate3type, Utility function, Year effects effects, Year effects effects firm, Youth food, Youth population rate.

Abstract

• https://api.istex.fr/document/046240BD9582276472A4DDA989F6331039D5C8CF/fulltext/pdf

Affiliations:

• Canada
• Ontario
• Toronto
• Université de Toronto

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

• to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000851
• to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000850
• to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000492
• to stream Main, to step Merge: 000788
• to stream Main, to step Curation: 000780

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000780 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000780 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    BernheimV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:046240BD9582276472A4DDA989F6331039D5C8CF
   |texte=   Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. Data generation: Mon Mar 5 17:33:33 2018. Site generation: Thu Apr 29 15:49:51 2021